Rangatiratanga and Constitutional

Te Tiriti affirmed the enduring, intrinsic mana and authority of Rangatira on behalf of, and accountable to, their hapū, consistent with He Whakaputanga. Ngā hapū never ceded their sovereignty, including the right to make international treaties. He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni and Te Tiriti o Waitangi are the pou on which Ngā Toki Whakarururanga stands.

Mana, Rangatiratanga and International Treaty Making

Māori have always played an active role in international affairs.

He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni (The Declaration of Independence 1835) and Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 affirmed the mana of the Rangatira, which includes the right to negotiate treaties on behalf of their hapū with other nations, whether with other hapū or foreign states.

The Crown has usurped Māori mana and tikanga and claims the exclusive right to make international treaties, whether on trade, Indigenous rights or te Taiao.

This video explains the history of Māori international engagement, including Māori-led Indigenous to Indigenous initiatives, and how global rules in international treaties negotiated by the Crown impact on te Tiriti responsibilities and rights of Māori, occasionally positively and often negatively.

This has been challenged in Waitangi Tribunal inquiries on Wai 262, Wai 2522 (the TPPA) and the current Constitutional Kaupapa inquiry (Wai 3300).

The take-away message is that protecting rangatiratanga requires vigilance at national and international levels, building alliances with other Indigenous peoples, building relationships with other states and international organisations, holding the Crown to account to honour Te Tiriti, and continuing to assert rangatiratanga in a rapidly changing world.

The findings of the Waitangi Tribunal in relation to Ngāpuhi in the Te Paparahi o te Raki inquiry (Wai 1040) and its report He Whakaputanga me Te Tiriti , and Tribunal reports on Te Urewera and Te Rohe Potae, confirmed the enduring mana motuhake and rangatiratanga of ngā hāpu. i

What that means in Aotearoa today, and strategies for constitutional transformation, were set out by Dr Moana Jackson and Professor Margaret Mutu on behalf of the Independent Working Group on Constitutional Transformation in their report Matike Mai, following extensive

However, none of these have directly addressed the constitutional authority of international treaty making. Dr Jackson’s evidence in several Tribunal inquiries has insisted that Māori would and could never give away the mana to treat with other nations. That has consistently been the position of Ngā Toki Whakarururanga in its dealings with the Crown in the international trade space. But the Tribunal has deferred to a future Tribunal inquiry and the Crown has simply said there is no way that independent Māori can have a seat at their table.

Ngā Toki Whakarururanga is therefore leading this argument in The Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry (Wai 3300), in addition to other initiatives to promote Indigenous to Indigenous relationships and treaty making. The Tribunal will hear claims concerning grievances relating to the constitution, self-government, and the electoral system. The Statement of Claim from Ngā Toki Whakarururanga, filed on 3 April 2024, challenges:

  • the denial of tino rangatiratanga by the Crown’s claim unilateral and unlawful assumption of sovereignty;
  • the rewriting of te Tiriti o Waitangi through the device of the “principles of the Treaty” including the latest bill proposed by ACT;
  • the role of capitalism in denial of tino rangatiratanga, including through Treaty Settlements, devolution policies, and property rights; and
  • Crown claims to exclusive rights of international treaty making that denies Māori the rangatiratanga over those decisions and relationships, including through free treaty and investment treaties.

The Inquiry began in December 2022, before the change of government in November 2023. It took on more urgent significance under the National/ACT/New Zealand First coalition that launched a direct assault on Te Tiriti o Waitangi through ACT’s proposed Treaty Principles Bill and NZ First’s proposal to remove or reword references to the “principles of the Treaty” in approximately 40 laws, in addition to cancelling hard fought-for policies, agencies, and services.

The Tribunal gave urgency to the Treaty Principles Bill and review of Treaty clauses. Its interim report found the Treaty Principles Bill breached the Crown’s obligations under te Tiriti, and the . The ACT leader David Seymour, also Minister in charge of the Treaty Principles Bill, treated the report with contempt, with the introduction of the bill timed to coincide with the Tribunal’s final report.

The hearings into the full Constitutional Kaupapa claim will centre around specific themes. The Tribunal has accepted that the four should cover:

  1. international treaty-making and rangatiratanga;
  2. human rights and te Tiriti o Waitangi;
  3. trade, investment and economic treaties and te Tiriti o Waitangi;
  4. environment and climate change and te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Reports and publications

Submission to the Standing Orders Select Committee on International Treaty Making

Mana and Constitutional Transformation of Treaty Making

This report consolidates the series of papers on constitutional transformation.

WP#1: Mana & The Un-ceded Right To Make Treaties Between Nations

The right to make treaties is inaliable and inherent.

WP#2: Legal Imperialism & The “doctrine Of Discovery”

The Crown’s assumption of that authority, and its denial of mana motuhake and exercise of rangatiratanga in the international domain, rests on several enduring colonial fictions.

WP#3: What The Waitangi Tribunal Has Said To Date

A small number of historical and contemporary Waitangi Tribunal reports have commented on the sovereignty question, but it has never been the central matter of these inquiries.

WP#4: The Crown’s Principles Of Constitutionalism

We critique the Crown’s position as described in Crowns 'Statement of Position on Principles of Constitutionalism'.

WP#5: The Crown’s Secret Review Of Treaty Making

The Waitangi Tribunal in the Wai 1040 inquiry Te Paparahi o te Raki affirmed that rangatira did not cede their mana or sovereignty to Queen Victoria in the international sphere.

Regulatory Standards Bill and Te Tiriti

Briefing on the Tiriti implications of the proposed Regulatory Standards Bill

A Crown Without Principles

A compilation of critique of Treaty Principles Bill with cartoons

Constitutional Kaupapa SOC

Statement of Claim from Ngā Toki Whakarururanga on Constitutional Kaupapa

Moana Jackson on treaty-making

Affidavit by Dr Moana Jackson on international treaty-making for Wai 2522 Inquiry

Treaty Principles Bill Opening Submissions

Opening Submissions of Ngā Toki Whakarururanga for Urgency Inquiry on the Treaty Principles Bill

Ngā Toki Whakarururanga Closing Submissions

Closing submissions of Ngā Toki Whakarururanga for Interim Hearing on Treaty Principles Bill, 22 May 2024

Tribunal’s Interim Report on Treaty Principles Bill

The interim report from the Waitangi Tribunal on the Treaty Principles Bill and Treaty Clause Review: Ngā Mātāpono

Ngā Toki Whakarururanga Statement of Constitutional Principles

Reinstatement of He Whakaputanga and Ti Tiriiti as constitutionally foundational

Ngā Toki Whakarururanga Critique of Crown’s Constitutional Principles

Statement of reply to the Crown Statement of Position

Ngā Toki Whakarururanga's Submission on the Regulatory Standards Bill

Submission on the Regulatory Standards Bill

Mana and Treaty Making

Presentation to Wai 3300 Tribunal at Te Tii Marae, 3 December 2025

Aide de Memoire on the Treaty of Waitangi Exception in Trade Agreements

The Treaty of Waitangi Exception in New Zealand’s Free Trade Agreements

Dr Amokura Kawharu on the Treaty Exception

Tiriti Carveout Process

Memo on USMCA case

The Optimal Tiriti Protection

Te Tiriti and Treaty Making under Constitutional Kaupapa

“Te Tiriti and Treaty Making”, presentation to Nga Kaihautū adapted for the Waitangi Tribunal (Wai 3325)

Moana Jackson Rohe Potae under Constitutional Kaupapa

Evidence of Moana Jackson to the Waitangi Tribunal on Te Rohe Potae (Wai 898) November 2012

Wai 1040 Affidavit of Professor Elizabeth Jane Kelsey dated 23 June 2016

Jane Kelsey’s affidavit to the Wai 1040 Te Raki Inquiry

Wai 3300 Crown Statement of Position on Constitutionalism

The Crown’s position tabled in the Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry (Wai 3300)

Crown’s Addendum on Principles

The Crown’s position on “Equality” for the Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry